Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 18:14

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Microbiome: First bacteria we meet can keep us out of hospital - BBC
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Apple's Terminal App Gets Colorful Redesign in macOS Tahoe - MacRumors
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
What can I do to deal with disrespectful children?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
ESA supports Moon mission carrying first European rover - European Space Agency
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What pet would you strongly not recommend?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why is it called iOS 26? What happened to iOS 19 for iPhone - 9to5Mac
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.